(The following is an excerpt from the book I am writing on forgiveness, called Loosening the Cords)
When an expert in the Jewish Law asked Jesus,
“Who is my neighbor?” he replied with one of his most well-known parables. To understand the significance of his answer
to the question we need to understand a few things about the characters in this
parable. There are four main characters
in this story. The parable goes as
follows:
“A man
was going down from Jerusalem to Jericho, when he was attacked by robbers. They
stripped him of his clothes, beat him and went away, leaving him half dead. A priest happened
to be going down the same road, and when he saw the man, he passed by on the
other side. So too, a Levite, when he came to the
place and saw him, passed by on the other side. But
a Samaritan, as he traveled,
came where the man was; and when he saw him, he took pity on him. He went to him and bandaged his wounds, pouring on
oil and wine. Then he put the man on his own donkey, brought him to an inn and
took care of him. The next day he took
out two denarii and gave them to the innkeeper. ‘Look after him,’ he said, ‘and
when I return, I will reimburse you for any extra expense you may have.’
“Which of these three do you think was a neighbor to
the man who fell into the hands of robbers?”
The expert in the law replied, “The one who had mercy
on him.”
Jesus told him, “Go and do likewise” (Luke 10: 30-37, emphasis added).
The one who asked
the question that prompted Jesus to tell this parable was a lawyer. He was someone who was very aware of all of
Jewish law and prided himself on living by that law. His question, “Who is my neighbor?” was
designed to discredit Jesus – to show that Jesus was not a follower of the
law.
The other members
of the audience who were listening to Jesus tell this parable would more than
likely identify themselves with the man who had been attacked. The road that Jesus was talking about was
well known for its lack of safety. His
listeners would have known this. As the
story progresses they would more than likely nod their heads in agreement as
Jesus told of the priest and the Levite passing by. “Of course they would pass us by. They don’t want to take the chance of
becoming unclean by touching the body of one who might be dead.” The lawyer would also agree that the priest
and Levite would pass him by. They were
concerned with maintaining their purity.
Their desire to follow the letter of the law would often trump any possibility
of acting with compassion.
Then comes the big
twist to the story. The next person to
come along is a Samaritan. The Samaritans
were despised in Jesus’ day. They were
descendants of gentiles and Jews – “half breeds” as they were often
called. The Samaritans were considered
spiritually defiled and were certainly treated as outcasts. Jesus’ listeners would have been shocked to hear
him cast a Samaritan as the hero of his story.
Yet, it is the
Samaritan who acts with compassion – not the priest or Levite – but, the
Samaritan. Jesus’ parables were often
filled with reversals and exaggerations.
His listeners would expect another Jew to act with compassion. Jesus challenged this view. He throws them a curve ball and has the
Samaritan go above and beyond what most of them would have done for a total
stranger found almost dead on the side of a road.
To understand the
power of this parable, perhaps we can replace the characters with more
contemporary examples. Here is a version
told by Clarence Jordan in his “Cotton Patch” version of the Gospel of
Luke. The “Cotton Patch Gospels” are set
in pre-civil rights movement, twentieth-century America.
One day a teacher
of an adult Bible class got up and tested him with this question: “Doctor, what
does one do to be saved?”
Jesus replied,
“What does the Bible say? How do you
interpret it?”
The teacher
answered, “Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul
and with all your physical strength and with all your mind; and love your
neighbor as yourself.”
“That is correct,”
answered Jesus. “Make a habit of this
and you’ll be saved.”
But the Sunday
school teacher, trying to save face, asked, “But … er … but … just who is my neighbor?”
Then Jesus laid
into him and said, “A man was going from Atlanta to Albany and some gangsters
held him up. When they had robbed him of
his wallet and brand-new suit, they beat him up and drove off in his car,
leaving him unconscious on the shoulder of the highway.
“Now it just so
happened that a white preacher was going down that same highway. When he saw the fellow, he stepped on the gas
and went scooting by. Shortly afterwards
a white Gospel song leader came down the road, and when he saw what had
happened, he too stepped on the gas.
“Then a black man
traveling that way came upon the fellow, and what he saw moved him to
tears. He stopped and bound up his
wounds as best he could, drew some water from his water-jug to wipe away the
blood and then laid him on the back seat. He drove
on into Albany and took him to the hospital and said to the nurse, ‘You all
take good care of this white man I found on the highway. Here’s the only two dollars I got, but you
all keep account of what he owes, and if he can’t pay it, I’ll settle up with
you when I make a pay-day.’
“Now if you had
been the man held up by the gangsters, which of these three – the white
preacher, the white song leader, or the black man – would you consider to have
been your neighbor?”
The teacher of the
adult Bible class said, “Why, of course, the – I mean, er … well, er … the one
who treated me kindly.”
Jesus said, “Well,
then, you get going and start living like that!”
With the original
parable Jesus was challenging his listeners as well as challenging notions of
ritual purity and several Jewish laws and norms. In the “Cotton Patch” re-telling, he is
challenging our notions of race and religion.
In the end he asks a question. He
is also asking us the same question. “Which
of these three do you think was a neighbor to the man who fell into the hands
of robbers?” He
replied, “The one who had mercy on him.”
Jesus instructions to the man that follow are perhaps the most important
words in this parable. He says to him, “Go
and do likewise.”
What does this mean
– to go and do likewise? Is he telling
the lawyer to simply act with compassion?
If we take into consideration all of the context of this story and the
audience that was listening to Jesus, we understand that he is saying much more
than that. He is telling the lawyer – he
is telling us – to look past all of
the many labels that we apply to people.
He is challenging our prejudices.
He is telling us that many of our laws, rituals, customs, and norms, if
held too tightly and followed too literally, will prevent us from lives
dedicated to love. To act with
compassion, we sometimes have to break from our normal ways of defining people
and from our normal ways of circumscribing our behavior.
This exchange between the lawyer and Jesus began with
the lawyer asking what he had to do to inherit “eternal life.” He was more than likely shocked by Jesus’
answer. There is no doubt that he was
also challenged by his answer. In
essence Jesus was telling him to break with everything he thought he knew. He was telling him to move past all of his
mental constructs and limiting beliefs.
He was telling him to be led by love, not by the law. He is telling us the very same thing.
No comments:
Post a Comment